Article content material

Till just lately, I by no means totally preferred the which means in the back of the excuse, “The canine ate my homework.” That modified this previous summer season with the arriving of Jasper, our new golden retriever pet. In keeping with his breed’s genetic disposition, I realized he used to be a handy guide a rough learn about when it got here to retrieving the newspaper from the entrance slump. Sadly, by the point the paper made it inside of, it used to be not readable as he had shredded it to items.

Article content material

I will’t recall a taxpayer ever announcing “the canine ate my homework” as a defence in courtroom for failing to offer backup documentation that the Canada Earnings Company used to be asking for, however probably the most excuses they get a hold of can now and again pressure credulity. Take two contemporary circumstances coping with COVID-19 advantages eligibility, and the taxpayers’ unwillingness (or, in all probability, lack of ability) to give you the essential evidence of source of revenue.

Article content material

The primary case, made up our minds in overdue December 2023, concerned a self-employed taxpayer who implemented for and won the Canada Emergency Reaction Receive advantages (CERB) for the total seven four-week classes and the Canada Restoration Receive advantages (CRB) for the next 27 two-week classes. The CRA discovered her ineligible as a result of she had now not earned a minimum of $5,000 of (self-)employment source of revenue within the prior length.

The taxpayer had prior paintings revel in accomplishing patent agent- and engineering-related paintings. In 2018, she labored as a patent agent trainee at a countrywide highbrow assets regulation company. Previous to this, she labored as a patent agent in the US.

In December 2019, the taxpayer allegedly won a task be offering to paintings remotely as an impartial contractor for {an electrical} apparatus corporate. On this function, she used to be to offer patent-related recommendation and analysis to her shopper and be paid US$6,200 (or roughly $8,000 on the time). At the taxpayer’s 2020 tax go back, she claimed $4,200 for bills when it comes to the trade use of her domestic, leading to her 2020 web self-employed trade source of revenue totalling $3,800. This used to be underneath the $5,000 source of revenue eligibility threshold to obtain CERB or CRB.

Article content material

Article content material

After consulting with an accountant, the taxpayer just lately amended her 2020 tax go back and changed her use-of-home bills all the way down to $2,100 since, in line with her, “she extensively utilized her paintings house for learn about and recreational time.” After the modification, her self-employment web trade source of revenue used to be $5,900.

Her COVID-19 advantages had been decided on for assessment via the CRA, and an agent referred to as her asking for documentation to ensure her self-employment source of revenue. She therefore equipped a unmarried bill and several other letters from the corporate “with restricted element.” After accomplishing each a first- and second-level assessment, the CRA decided she used to be now not eligible as she hadn’t earned the considered necessary $5,000 of source of revenue.

The taxpayer appealed the CRA’s second-level determination to the Federal Courtroom asking for a judicial assessment. The courtroom’s function isn’t to exchange its determination for that of the CRA officer, however to decide whether or not the CRA’s determination used to be “affordable” taking into consideration the information and proof. An inexpensive determination is “one according to an internally coherent and rational chain of study this is justified, clear and intelligible in the case of the acceptable factual and criminal constraints.”

Article content material

The pass judgement on reviewed all of the proof, together with the CRA’s detailed and complete determination studies. In the ones studies, the CRA agent famous the taxpayer had no earlier historical past of incomes self-employment source of revenue, and equipped no documentation to beef up that she had in fact won the USA$6,200, or that this quantity used to be despatched via qualified mail.

As well as, the bill submitted to the company via the taxpayer didn’t point out whether or not it have been paid, the kind of fee or the date of fee, and it wasn’t signed via both birthday party. The letter settlement used to be now not a proper contract and most effective in brief indicated the character of the engagement. However in all probability most significantly, all of the paperwork the taxpayer equipped from the company had been created years after she claimed to were paid the USA$6,200, and failed to suggest the precise date of fee.

The CRA concluded the bill and accompanying letters from the company didn’t represent enough convincing proof of a fee having been made to the taxpayer within the absence of a real switch or receipt of cash. The pass judgement on stated that the taxpayer “is indubitably entitled to be remunerated in money,” however it used to be her accountability to care for enough information with a view to depend on money bills to beef up her eligibility for the CERB or CRB advantages.

Article content material

The pass judgement on concluded the CRA agent had “meticulously assessed the proof equipped via (the taxpayer) and located it used to be inadequate to determine her eligibility.” The pass judgement on, due to this fact, dominated the CRA’s determination to disclaim the convenience used to be affordable, because it had “all of the considered necessary attributes of transparency, justification, and intelligibility.”

The second one COVID-19 advantages eligibility case, additionally made up our minds in December 2023, used to be a follow-up determination of the Federal Courtroom involving a self-employed bookkeeper in British Columbia who operates his trade via plenty of firms. The CRA decided he used to be now not entitled to the CRB at the foundation he had now not earned a minimum of $5,000 of (self-)employment source of revenue. In October 2022, the taxpayer implemented for judicial assessment and succeeded at the foundation that the CRA breached “procedural equity” via failing to advise him that it required additional documentation past his T4 and T4A slips.

Article content material

The CRA asked the taxpayer’s financial institution statements to ensure his source of revenue, however the taxpayer refused, announcing: “I’m a personal citizen; I worth my proper to privateness and my civil liberties. I can’t disclose non-public, personal and confidential knowledge akin to financial institution statements as I worth my proper to privateness and my civil liberties, as a personal citizen. Individually, It’s not that i am a trade. Inquiring for my non-public, personal and confidential statements, is a breach of my civil liberty.”

This didn’t cross over neatly with the pass judgement on, who pushed aside the taxpayer’s moment request for judicial assessment: “It’s (the taxpayer’s) proper to refuse to give you the asked knowledge; then again, he can not now criticize that the CRA decided it had inadequate knowledge to beef up his declare.”

Jamie Golombek, FCPA, FCA, CFP, CLU, TEP, is the managing director, Tax & Property Making plans with CIBC Non-public Wealth in Toronto. Jamie.Golombek@cibc.com.

For those who preferred this tale, join extra within the FP Investor publication.

Article content material