Our favorite vehicles of 2023: Porsche 911 Recreation Vintage

Our favorite vehicles of 2023: Porsche 911 Recreation Vintage

[ad_1]

Porsche is lately hooked at the exhausting stuff: the rare-groove particular editions each producer of observe appears to be purveying as even though their life trusted it. (Perhaps it does?) It’s obtrusive why.

Those creations pleasure the engineering groups, however so too do they have got the bean-counters definitely frothing on the mouth, such is the willingness to swallow outrageous costs. It’s simple to look those initiatives as cynical.

And you then meet the vehicles first hand.

The Porsche 911 Dakar? Foolish automobile, foolish worth, however really, fantastically advantageous corporate in the actual global and an quick vintage.

The brand new 911 S/T? Vastly contrived, despicably pricey, however one of the vital intoxicating but usable supercar Porsche has ever made. Chic.

Which brings us to the 911 Recreation Vintage, which arguably began all this nonsense within the ‘997’ generation, when it embraced a style-over-substance means with a wholly useless duck-tail, houndstooth innards and nearly no mechanical tickles.

Our favorite vehicles of 2023: Porsche 911 Recreation Vintage

Asking worth: £140k. Or, in 2009, £10k greater than a 911 GT2!

This 12 months, Porsche reprised the Recreation Vintage concept, cueing prejudiced ambivalence within the Autocar workplace, in particular when the cost was once published to be £214k.

Except for the brand new SC is a essentially attention-grabbing 911, with its personal personality and quirks.

Sure, you get all of the aesthetic trinkets, which I will be able to take or go away, however beneath this is an entity each particular and distinctive: a non-S 911 Turbo shorn of its entrance driveshafts and fitted with a handbook ’field. In 2023, it feels just a little rebellious.

[ad_2]

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Back To Top
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x