[ad_1]
Sam Bankman-Fried, the founding father of now-defunct crypto change FTX, suggested the court docket to reject the prosecutor’s limine requests.
The memorandum, authored via SBF’s legal professional Mark Cohen, was once submitted on Sept. 1. It criticizes the US Division of Justice (DOJ) for those requests being “unfounded and overbroad.”
Specifically, it asserts that many of the issues the federal government raises are beside the point for attention at this degree. It additionally contends that the requests made via the prosecutor intention to introduce beside the point and prejudicial proof associated with uncharged or non-existent misconduct, undermining doable defenses and making an attempt to confess wide-ranging rumour.
The file additional highlights that the prosecutor’s requests lack prison strengthen and are impractical in implementation, warranting denial.
Protection calls for truthful trial for SBF
This most up-to-date memorandum comes when many further filings from the DOJ were filed inquiring for intervention within the case.
On Aug. 29, the U.S. DOJ filed paperwork aiming to bar all seven skilled witnesses slated to testify on behalf of Bankman-Fried in his upcoming trial scheduled for October. In those prison filings, the DOJ asserts that the protection’s panel of professionals falls in need of the essential requirements for participation in legal court cases, alleging that their skilled evaluations lack reliability and feature the prospective to introduce bias or confusion into the jury’s deliberations.
On the identical time, SBF’s enlistment of skilled witnesses coincides with rising stories suggesting that his trial, initially slated for October, could be rescheduled to March 2024.
SBF’s prison representatives had prior to now contended that the belated revelation of considerable further proof via U.S. prosecutors (on Aug. 29) may just probably undermine his potentialities for a good trial.
[ad_2]
