Making improvements to The Double Diamond Design Procedure — Smashing Mag

As a dressmaker, you’re indubitably accustomed to the thought of the Double Diamond, that tremendous easy graphical illustration of the best design procedure.

In most cases you’ll see two squares circled 45 levels: the primary sq. will say one thing like “uncover” and “outline,” whilst the second will inspire you to “discover” and “create.” Each and every diamond may have a heading, similar to “issue” and “answer,” or the extra punchy “design the best factor” and “design the article proper.” Alongside the facet of every diamond, there shall be a label explaining the way you will have to first diverge, i.e., get a hold of a lot of choices ahead of you’ll be able to converge right into a unmarried resolution.

It’s some of the most straightforward articulations of the design procedure available in the market. It’s additionally why many designers hate their jobs. Let me give an explanation for…

Word: When you’re curious as to who and when nailed down the Double Diamond thought in its provide trendy shape — which we see being referenced nearly in every single place at the present time — take a look at the Appendix on the finish of the object (“How do We Describe Design Procedure?”).

An illustration that shows the process centered around the traditional ‘Designer Centric’ double diamond. It shows the basic design steps when designing a new product; the illustrations show the steps as they should happen in theory.
The standard “Double Diamond” as seen via designers. (Massive preview)

Designers Are Downside-Finders And Downside-Solvers

As designers, we love to consider ourselves as problem-finders in addition to problem-solvers. Give us a person problem, and we’ll use our analysis talents to discover what’s in point of fact occurring underneath the outside! We’ll take this data, reframe the issue, and get a hold of a good higher answer — one who’s by no means been regarded as ahead of. That’s what the double diamond is all about. It’s about heading off the evident, shallow answers and as a substitute liberating us as much as be in point of fact inventive.

“The system of an issue is regularly extra very important than its answer, that could be simply a question of mathematical or experimental ability. To lift new questions, new chances, to treat previous issues from a special approach, calls for inventive creativeness and marks actual advance in science.”

— Albert Einstein & Leopold Infeld (by means of: “The usage of the Downside Reframing Means

I feel the most productive instance of this can also be present in the United Kingdom TV program Blue Peter, a British kids’s tv leisure program created via John Hunter Blair, which is the longest-running kids’s TV display on the planet.

A couple of years again, Blue Peter were given to interview design legend Jony Ive. They defined to Jony how they’d set a problem for his or her younger audience to design a lunchbox, pencil case, and faculty bag, multi function. He answered via pronouncing that you simply had to be in point of fact cautious to not have the phrase “field” within the temporary as a result of it could resolve the trail you went down. You’ll want to believe if Jony had set the problem, he would possibly have requested the children to “design a way of storing and transporting your lunch to university.” A pleasing reframing of the issue which didn’t comprise the proposed answer!

I’ve been in numerous conferences the place stakeholders have efficiently made the similar “mistake” because the Blue Peter presenters after they outlined what the end result will have to be. And I’ve observed an equivalent collection of pissed off designers, wondering the purpose of them even being there in the event that they’re simply going to be informed what to design and learn how to design it. (And, in fact, they hardly say this to the stakeholders’ faces. As an alternative, they only moan about it at the back of their backs.)

Exploring The Context

Designers understandably really feel annoyed when requested to “design a lunchbox” as it instantly limits the possible consequence. This is going towards what they’ve been taught design is all about and what design workflow fashions, such because the Double Diamond declare.

In a really perfect international, designers would a lot wish to spend time “bathing” in the issue area. This would come with in need of to know the number of meals pieces children take to university with them and the extent of coverage they want. It could additionally contain following children’ trips over a few weeks to look how the goods are used and chatting with children, to know what they believe is cool, and to their oldsters, to know what’s sensible. After all, there’s a great opportunity that in any case this, chances are you’ll make a decision {that a} lunch field is precisely this type of factor you will have to be designing! Then again, moderately than this being just a speculation, you’ll now believe that you simply’re at the proper trail.

The architect Eliel Saarinen talks eloquently in regards to the significance of designing a factor via taking into consideration it in its context:

“All the time design a factor via taking into consideration it in its subsequent greater context — a chair in a room, a room in a space, a space in an atmosphere, an atmosphere in a town plan.”

Eliel Saarinen

As such, it’s herbal for designers to need to diverge, even though they finally end up converging on precisely the similar factor. Then again, for our industry companions, this kind of conduct can also be very irritating.

What If You In truth Simply Need A Lunch Field?

Whilst designers love to imagine they’ve been employed to “assume outdoor the lunch field” (sorry for the pun), the reality of the topic is that almost all industry stakeholders don’t see design this fashion.

As an alternative, when maximum industry stakeholders are tasked with developing some way for youngsters to take meals to university, they instantly recall to mind “lunchbox.” They’ll then ask their business designers and graphic designers to get a hold of one thing attention-grabbing that folks and youngsters will purchase; preferably, one thing which can also be made cost-effectively the usage of their present factories, apparatus, and provide chain. Oh, and so they want it in a position for when the children return to university in 3 months’ time, as that’s height lunchbox-buying season.

Query: What number of UX Designers does it take to screw in a lightbulb?
Solution: First, we wish to adopt a six months lengthy challenge figuring out the function of sunshine in society!

On this context, the group has already made up our minds that the lunchbox is a superbly cheap, logical, and evident answer, so when the design workforce begins pushing again and requesting time to do further analysis, it seems like a waste of time. Or worse, it could sound just like the design workforce is actively seeking to derail the challenge. As such, a lot as I hate to mention this, infrequently you’ve simply were given to grit your tooth and design the darn lunchbox.

How Design In truth Will get Achieved (Out of doors Apple And Airbnb)

Whilst the double diamond thought is a superb fashion, it’s additionally in large part a fable. As an alternative, maximum organizations may have a couple of conferences which typically received’t contain design (sorry). When you’re fortunate, they could take a look at some exterior survey knowledge or marketplace knowledge and are available to the belief that we, too, want a lunchbox.

Getting the rest accomplished within even a quite small group takes effort, as anyone who has ever been tasked to prepare a workforce lunch or a brief corporate retreat will know. As such, it normally calls for a senior stakeholder to impress toughen. As a result of this, “buyer discovery” is regularly extra about discovering proof to again up the statement that that is the proper factor to construct moderately than doubtlessly finding that it’s the flawed factor to construct.

By the point the theory will get to design, the verdict has normally been made, assets have normally already been allotted, a release date will have been set (regularly arbitrarily and with out in point of fact figuring out how lengthy designing the article will if truth be told take), and there’s little or no real interest in doing the rest which would possibly gradual this choice teach down or derail it altogether. I name this procedure the opposite double diamond.

Whilst this fashion of running would possibly appear loopy to designers, in maximum organizations, that is precisely how issues paintings, and preventing towards that procedure is in point of fact an uphill struggle. Then again, there is a chance right here if you wish to grasp it, which lies in the second one part of the “opposite double diamond” thought.

The Opposite Double Diamond (Or Making It Paintings Higher)

Now, let me get started with this: I’m no longer claiming that the opposite double diamond is perfect. Some distance from it. Then again, this can be a practical fashion for the way paintings if truth be told will get accomplished.

I additionally imagine there’s a method for design groups to slowly — and I in point of fact do imply slowly — pivot clear of this and in opposition to the standard double diamond. However you’re no longer going to get there via including a few slides about it to the design deck your boss asks you to give on the subsequent management away day. As an alternative, it’s all about what you do post-launch.

An illustration that shows the process centered around the ‘Reverse’ double diamond. It shows the basic design steps when designing a new product; the illustration shows the steps as they actually happen in practice.
The “Opposite Double Diamond” thought which is in keeping with how maximum corporations if truth be told perform. (Massive preview)

If you’re taking a detailed take a look at the fashion above, you’ll see that the primary a part of the opposite double diamond is largely accepting the established order, letting your boss inform you to ship the metaphorical identical of a “lunchbox characteristic,” and developing the most productive model imaginable with the time and data to be had. Then again, the trick to creating the opposite double diamond paintings is to actively observe how this new characteristic plays and — watch for it — make ideas about how it may be stepped forward post-launch.

As soon as the lunchbox characteristic has been delivered and is out within the wild, the stakeholder who backed it not must be protecting of it. The issue switches from being a supply issue (“Are we able to if truth be told get this factor introduced?”) to being a price extraction issue (“How are we able to make this present factor paintings higher?”). That is the precise time limit the place you place your corporation hat on, take a look at the stats, and say one thing like this, “This selection lately has quite low usage of simplest 5%. Then again, we imagine that with some tweaks, we will be able to get this as much as 20%.”

In ye olde days, this was once referred to as “creating a industry case,” and it’s frankly a lot more straightforward to make a industry case for one thing that already exists and also you imagine can also be made higher than it’s doing analysis on one thing that doesn’t but exist and could be simply high quality as it’s.

In essence, you’re nonetheless doing analysis paintings, and also you’re nonetheless going to be exploring a vary of possible answers — you’re simply doing this as soon as the characteristic is already out out there and you realize precisely the way it’s acting. After all, this all relies on a variety of issues, together with how neatly or poorly the characteristic plays, how excellent your design and product leaders are at creating a industry case, and what sort of paintings the design workforce has on. Until you’re ready to make a forged liberate plan, it’s most likely that the second one part of the opposite double diamond will if truth be told be uncoupled from the primary.

For firms that experience featured groups and expansion groups, it’s even imaginable that your characteristic groups will ship the primary part of the opposite double diamond ahead of handing it over to the expansion workforce to do the second one part. Because of this, this procedure is lower than best. Then again, it’s a lot more pragmatic and is going high quality “with the grain” of maximum organizations.

Iterating In opposition to The Conventional Double Diamond

Previous, I hinted that this procedure would possibly, over the years, help you get to the “design nirvana” represented via the standard double diamond. The good judgment here’s that via repeatedly making improvements to merchandise post-launch, the group learns to accept as true with the design workforce’s skill and, extra importantly, their imaginative and prescient.

As you garner extra accept as true with and proof, over the years, you’ll be able to get started making the case that it might be faster and more cost effective should you spent a couple of weeks prematurely seeking to keep away from the errors, which will regularly take months and even years to deal with. Errors that will even regularly lead to some misplaced earnings. If truth be told, that is efficiently the similar argument many designers make for adopting the standard double diamond workflow within the first position — you’re simply doing so via the usage of proof moderately than trust and principle.


The Double Diamond thought is superb, however it’s simply no longer the way in which maximum organizations serve as. If, as a dressmaker, you put your expectancies round this theoretical fashion, you’re going to be regularly dissatisfied! Then again, designers are supposed to be nice at figuring out how issues if truth be told paintings moderately than how we assume they will have to paintings.

If we need to start up exchange, we wish to ask for extra correct fashions of the way design if truth be told works within our organizations and goal the spaces the place now we have probably the most leverage. I imagine this implies adopting some variant of the “opposite double diamond” concept, accepting that we’re going to be informed to ship “lunch field options” 90% of the time, and transferring our consideration clear of pre-launch answers to post-launch answers.

We will be able to design after which liberate a excellent first model of a product out into the arena as temporarily as imaginable after which use our industry and communique talents to petition for and make measurable enhancements to it. And if we will be able to do that constantly, there’s a slender — however tangible! — probability that we will be able to transfer the “double diamond” again round.

Additional Studying

  • Will have to You Create An MVP Earlier than Developing An App?,” via Suzanne Scacca (Smashing Mag)
    Apps are neither small endeavor nor reasonable to construct and take care of. So, ahead of you progress forward with developing a brand new cellular app or SaaS to your shopper, most likely you will have to believe launching a minimal viable product (MVP) as a substitute. With an MVP, you might have a low-risk and lower-cost method of checking out your thought in the marketplace. What’s to not love about that?
  • Getting Again Into The (Proper) Deliverables Trade,” via Rian van der Merwe (Smashing Mag)
    “Get out of the deliverables industry” has change into rather a mantra within the lean startup and UX actions. There’s a lot to like in that sentiment. In any case, for each wireframe you’re making, you’re no longer delivery code to consumers. However identical to with the concept that of a minimal viable product (MVP), it’s most likely that we’ve taken this sound recommendation to an excessive which if truth be told is hurtful to the introduction of excellent merchandise. What follows is the creator’s account of navigating those stormy design seas along with the neighborhood.
  • Design Pondering & Minimal Viable Product: Is This the Proper Means?,” via Masha Panchenko (Eleken Weblog)
    Design considering has change into a extremely standard way right through the ultimate 40 years. It’s utilized in IT, industry, schooling, design — actually in every single place. There’s even a e-book about making use of design considering for private use referred to as Designing Your Lifestyles. We don’t know if design considering will lend a hand to switch your lifestyles for the simpler, however what we all know is that design considering is a smart way relating to development a Minimal Viable Product.
  • Designing Your Lifestyles, a e-book via Invoice Burnett & Dave Evans
    A e-book that presentations you learn how to construct — to design — a lifestyles you’ll be able to thrive in at any age or level. Designers create worlds and resolve issues the usage of design considering. The whole lot in our lives was once designed via any individual, and each design begins with an issue {that a} dressmaker or workforce of designers seeks to unravel. On this e-book, the authors display us how design considering can lend a hand us create a lifestyles this is each significant and pleasant, irrespective of who or the place we’re, what we do or have accomplished for a residing, or how younger or previous we’re.
    (Editor’s Word: This e-book was once, in truth, additionally really helpful to me via Joshua Mauldin some time in the past, and I can’t however extremely counsel it to everybody! It’s an unbelievable, very helpful learn. — M.B.)
  • The usage of the Downside Reframing Means,” via Sebastian Straube (product control & discovery trainer at Accenture Trade Agility)
    Steer clear of leaping without delay into answer considering and no longer empathizing with the issue itself; taking a look at an issue from other angles is helping to construct extra leading edge, sustainable answers, and you want to check out other reframing practices and strategies as there isn’t a one-size-fits-all way.
  • Is UX Analysis About ‘De-risking’ Design?,” via Jonathan Baker-Bates (UX architect at LBi, VP of UX at TES International)
    Is UX analysis focused on serving to designers expect eventual results of design interventions, or is its function to “de-risk” UX and industry concepts? Analysis is regularly framed as some way of decreasing the danger to the industry (this is applicable each to design validation in addition to to exploratory analysis), however analysis will have to be checking whether or not what we stated a few given intervention if truth be told has a tendency to occur.
  • Fashionable Double Diamond design: Rethinking a vintage design procedure,” via Victory Brown
    To perform your duties, you’ll wish to arrange a procedure that can help you entire them temporarily and in addition give the most productive effects. On occasion the design procedure could be a jungle of traits and patterns; it comes to numerous backward and forward to supply the most productive design answers. No design is the general design, and each process can also be iterated on. Because of this the Design Council got here in combination in 2005 to increase a brand new way to designing answers with inventive considering, techniques design, and design control in thoughts: the Double Diamond design procedure.
  • Historical past of the Double Diamond
    This newsletter describes the historical past at the back of the Double Diamond thought, created via the Design Council (established in 1944 via Winston Churchill’s wartime executive). Over the process a number of classes, the gang got here up with a simplified strategy to describe any design and innovation procedure. It’s in keeping with 4 distinct levels that the design workforce, intentionally in the hunt for a memorable software, named Uncover, Outline, Increase, and Ship.

Appendix: “How Do We Describe The Design Procedure?”

A brief little bit of historical past. In 2003, the Design Council promoted the certain affect of adopting a strategic way to design and the worth of “design control” as a convention. Then again, they’d no same old method of describing the supporting procedure. Richard Eisermann, Design Council’s then Director of Design and Innovation, concept this was once incompatible with their broader message, so he requested his workforce, “How can we describe the design procedure?”

“The workforce put within the paintings seeking to outline design, procedure, strategies, and so forth. What we did with the Double Diamond was once codify it, rename the stairs, and popularize it. It was once essential paintings, however we have been no doubt status at the shoulders of giants.”

— Richard Eisermann

After all, kite-shaped (diamond-shaped) procedure fashions had been referenced way back to the Nineteen Sixties, however fashions of the design procedure weren’t extensively shared at this level. A part of the Design Council’s explanation why for developing the Double Diamond thought was once to deal with this loss of visibility. These days the Double Diamond is thought of as a universally obtainable description of the design procedure, has change into an authorised a part of design language, and is used and referenced international.

Historical past of the Double Diamond, The Design Council

Smashing Editorial
(mb, yk)
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Back To Top
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x